Skip to main content

Nuclear deal- The US media

The reaction of the media to the just concluded nuclear deal between US and India is quite interesting to read. While the Indian press was singing praise for the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the opposite was true in the case of US president George Bush. Two articles that appeared in New York Times (NYTimes) and Washington Post (Post) summed up their criticisms.

(Although there is a good coverage of US President visit to India. I don't think it was greatly followed by the people. For example, of the top 25 articles read in New York Times in the last one week, none had US president visit to India. Also, the BBC evening bulletin at 6 PM in the terrestial network on the day when nuclear deal was announced, had no mention of the nuclear deal between India and US)

Coming back to what is being written about the deal. Two important questions are being raised. First, with US assuring of permanent supply of uranium to civilian nuclear reactors, India would free up its domestic uranium supplies to military purposes. Second, how much will the deal promote peace in the region.

David E. Sanger writing in NYTimes 'We Are (Aren't) Safer With India in the Nuclear Club', said there was no explanation how to keep Pakistan from boosting its own arsenal. For example, what if China does a similar deal with Pakistan.

"That is why some experts believe the deal could make the world more dangerous: Even if India is a responsible player, the deal could touch off a regional race to produce more bomb fuel. In that case, more of that fuel would be floating around — perhaps to tempt terrorists. If, on the other hand, India shows restraint and Mr. Bush's gamble pays off, other nations that defiantly built their own weapons may gradually be drawn back into a new club whose membership rules are still being", he added.

However, in the Post, the article titled 'In Deal with India, Bush Has Eye on China' by Paul Ritcher devoted entirely to the India- China angle. He talked of how the deal was being designed by the US administration to counter-balance the influence of China in the region.

It would be great if some articles or columns to offer India's perspective of the deal. How it would affect its relationship with China, Pakistan and Iran. And, also with Russia. How a civilian nuclear power would impact the cost of generating electricity. How much is a credible nuclear deterrent and does India has enough uranium to sustain such credible deterrent. (Probably, these question would have been dealt with and that I would have missed reading)

Comments

Dear John
I was reading the PTI ticket today, which said that India should take US prior approval before it takes Uranium from Russia. A quick recap: The Russian PM is expected in India later and they have offered Uranium for Tarapore reactors.
Aryabhata said…
The real US intentions for this deal seem to be

a) Stop India from testing further nuclear weapons perpetually. Even through there is no explicit written clause but I am sure our government has given enough guarantees.

b) Curtail the progress on India’s Fast Breeder Reactor program or Thorium based fuel cycle. Make India dependent on Uranium based reactors.

c) Allow the Tritium reserves to exhaust (half life period is very less) so that India will lack the raw materials for making Thermonuclear bombs in the future.

d) Dramatically reduce the Plutonium stock pile in India by making India part of FMCT.

e) Get extra advantage with India’s support for maintaining US global order. We are already seeing India’s foreign policy change with regards to Iran.

f) Get India perpetually dependent on Uranium based nuclear reactors.

Popular posts from this blog

Being hopeless....

Three months back when my mom was visiting me, she experience heart palpitations for two consecutive nights. Worried I called my cardiologist friend who asked us to visit him in the government hospital on that day as it was a non-OPD (out patients day) duty for him. Apparently non-OPD days are less crowded. As we sat waiting, we saw many worried parents bringing their just born babies to treat serious heart problems. What struck me were the faces of these parents - a feeling of hopelessness. This was their last hope to treat their infants in a state-run hospital as they don't  have money to take them elsewhere.

Fortunately, the staff at this government hospital were treating patients sympathetically. I hoped the patients would have got the best of treatment available. In comparison, patients were treated as cattle herds at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), India's premier hospital. To get an cardio OPD appointment, you will have stand in the line from 5 PM …

Happiness, street vendors, and negotiations......

Few days back I was watching a documentary series, "India's Frontier Trains". The three-part series was on trains connecting India with its neighbours - Bangladesh, Pakistan and Nepal. Yes, there is a train connection between India and Nepal, and that train is the only functioning train for the whole of Nepal.

In the episode on the train between India and Bangladesh, the program documented a life of a chocolate seller inside the train. He boards the train in the Bangladesh side of the route. A sole bread winner for a family of four, he earns by selling chocolates in the train.

He faces a perennial problem: because of hot weather conditions, his chocolates melt. In those hot days, his earnings are meager. A basic cooling device like this costs seventeen pounds and he couldn't afford that.

What moved me was the insensitive nature of some passengers in haggling with this struggling chocolate seller. They would force down the price by 10 pence or more (which is more tha…

Be a democrat in US, but root for BJP in India

Before I say anything I would like to disclose my knowledge of political affairs in India. I had lot of assumptions and predictions for this just concluded elections, and none of them came true. So I am not going to talk politics and waste time. But this election season reminded me of a funny incident when I was a student in Arizona State University (ASU) in 2004.
As a thumb rule, I discuss politics only with close friends. So my flat mates in Phoenix had no idea about my political likes and dislikes. So on the day when BJP lost the elections, one of my flat mates – who used to hate George Bush and an active supporter of Democrats – saw me in that morning, and said, "What John, people have done this" in a disappointed tone.
He saw no contradiction whatsoever in supporting democrats in US and at the same time supporting BJP in India. It was after that I started noticing Indian students in US, and people who got their jobs in US recently, most of them exhibited this kind of du…