Skip to main content

Op-Ed and Editing...

Recently, New York Times ran an article to clarify readers how articles appearing in Op-Ed columns are edited. (somewhere I read it is called Op-Ed because articles were placed opposite to the editorials). It was interesting to read how the process works. Sample this one,

"We also check assertions. If news articles - from The Times and other publications - are at odds with a point or an example in an essay, we need to resolve whatever discrepancy exists.
For instance, an Op-Ed article critical of newly aggressive police tactics in Town X can't flatly say the police have no reason to change their strategy if there have been news reports that violence in the town is rising. This doesn't mean the writer can't still argue that there are other ways to deal with Town X's crime problem - he just can't say that the force's decision to change came out of the blue.

How would we resolve the Town X issue? Well, we'd discuss it with the writer - generally by telephone or e-mail - and we'd try to find a solution that preserves the writer's argument while also adhering to the facts."

It reminded me of how editing was done when I was a reporter. In an overwhelming majority of cases, either my story was cut from the end for want of space or changes made without me being consulted. I would not blame anyone as I used to file a majoriy of the reports late when the editors are flooded with reports from all centres. However, it is only in some rare cases I have seen editors getting back to me for clarifications. I would like to read some articles how reporters' copy are being edited in some of the major newspapers like FT, WSJ, NYTimes and Washington Post.

Here is the link of NYTimes article,
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/opinion/31shipley.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5070&en=e40c23aefb7a6907&ex=1123128000

Comments

Ramnath said…
Johnny, it's about Op-ed pieces. (Of course, i noticed you didnt strictly compare reports and essays, and also, you said you would like to see how news reports are edited in NYT etc.)

I guess, reports don't (and can't) get the same treatment that Op-ed pieces get, even in NYT, WP, FT etc, with all the time constraints.

I remember reading about a NYTimes reporter, who literally had to dictate a report while running.

And in a recent essay on Watergate scandal (by one of WP ediors) I read he assigned a story to Woodstein and started working on the backgrouner immediately. (In news reports, a journalist's real claim is the 'scoop' in the para one)

If this is the case, imagine newspapers following the same process for news reports.

But with Op-ed pieces - and stories in weeklies like Economist - writers have to approve the pieces.

Madhavan said an Economist story will go to print only after a journalist sees the final draft and acknowldges it with a signature.

Popular posts from this blog

How can you support a publication you like

When I shifted to my half completed (more on this some other time) flat in Gurgaon in 2016, I couldn't locate newspaper distributors for four or five months. Suddenly, from consuming four or five newspapers, I was completely dependent on digital media. I was going less directly to the news source (say, thehindu.com or livemint.com) but was getting my news from Facebook and Twitter, and from apps like Flipboard.

It became an experiment, as I was consuming interesting stuff but I was not necessarily getting informed. People whom I have met once or twice, or have never met are influencing what I was consuming via Facebook. If you're wondering why you often see posts by your most popular friends, that's the way Facebook algorithms work, unless you specify who's feed should come first. If Facebook promotes post of your not-so-popular friends, why would you read!

I searched hard to find a newspaper distributor and found one finally, after four or five months. So now I subsc…

What if government schools and hospitals attract people with money

I had this random thought (and I get this often only when I have 1000 important things to finish!)- what if people who can afford private schools and hospitals find state-run schools and hospitals good enough for them. All of my friends in UK and US don't send their children to private schools (its another matter that location matters on quality of state-run schools there) and those in UK, don't spend money on healthcare.

Just imagine if this can happen in India. People will be left with more surplus that they can save more or spend on something else. School fees in major Indian cities can be as high as Rs 2 lakh per child per year. The sheer confidence that we don't have to spend on medical expenses and the state will take care will give confidence to spend more money.

The multiplier effect of this extra money in the hands of the people will hugely benefit the economy, and can spring creative enterprises.

This level of expenditure (even Rs50,000 per child per year) is si…

Being hopeless....

Three months back when my mom was visiting me, she experience heart palpitations for two consecutive nights. Worried I called my cardiologist friend who asked us to visit him in the government hospital on that day as it was a non-OPD (out patients day) duty for him. Apparently non-OPD days are less crowded. As we sat waiting, we saw many worried parents bringing their just born babies to treat serious heart problems. What struck me were the faces of these parents - a feeling of hopelessness. This was their last hope to treat their infants in a state-run hospital as they don't  have money to take them elsewhere.

Fortunately, the staff at this government hospital were treating patients sympathetically. I hoped the patients would have got the best of treatment available. In comparison, patients were treated as cattle herds at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), India's premier hospital. To get an cardio OPD appointment, you will have stand in the line from 5 PM …