Skip to main content

Op-Ed and Editing...

Recently, New York Times ran an article to clarify readers how articles appearing in Op-Ed columns are edited. (somewhere I read it is called Op-Ed because articles were placed opposite to the editorials). It was interesting to read how the process works. Sample this one,

"We also check assertions. If news articles - from The Times and other publications - are at odds with a point or an example in an essay, we need to resolve whatever discrepancy exists.
For instance, an Op-Ed article critical of newly aggressive police tactics in Town X can't flatly say the police have no reason to change their strategy if there have been news reports that violence in the town is rising. This doesn't mean the writer can't still argue that there are other ways to deal with Town X's crime problem - he just can't say that the force's decision to change came out of the blue.

How would we resolve the Town X issue? Well, we'd discuss it with the writer - generally by telephone or e-mail - and we'd try to find a solution that preserves the writer's argument while also adhering to the facts."

It reminded me of how editing was done when I was a reporter. In an overwhelming majority of cases, either my story was cut from the end for want of space or changes made without me being consulted. I would not blame anyone as I used to file a majoriy of the reports late when the editors are flooded with reports from all centres. However, it is only in some rare cases I have seen editors getting back to me for clarifications. I would like to read some articles how reporters' copy are being edited in some of the major newspapers like FT, WSJ, NYTimes and Washington Post.

Here is the link of NYTimes article,
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/opinion/31shipley.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5070&en=e40c23aefb7a6907&ex=1123128000

Comments

Ramnath said…
Johnny, it's about Op-ed pieces. (Of course, i noticed you didnt strictly compare reports and essays, and also, you said you would like to see how news reports are edited in NYT etc.)

I guess, reports don't (and can't) get the same treatment that Op-ed pieces get, even in NYT, WP, FT etc, with all the time constraints.

I remember reading about a NYTimes reporter, who literally had to dictate a report while running.

And in a recent essay on Watergate scandal (by one of WP ediors) I read he assigned a story to Woodstein and started working on the backgrouner immediately. (In news reports, a journalist's real claim is the 'scoop' in the para one)

If this is the case, imagine newspapers following the same process for news reports.

But with Op-ed pieces - and stories in weeklies like Economist - writers have to approve the pieces.

Madhavan said an Economist story will go to print only after a journalist sees the final draft and acknowldges it with a signature.

Popular posts from this blog

'koil madu' and myself........

'Koil madu' is a Tamil term used to describe the cows that are tied to the temple. It is there forever. In literal usage, the term can be used on people who spend loads of time at religious place. I might fit that description well. Haven't missed many Sunday church services. If I have to put a number, I would have attended 39 out of 40 years of Sunday services.

Last Sunday, the preacher at my Delhi church was referring to Ecclesiastes 11: 1 and 2. In the last few years, I have started to like the Message translation of The Bible. This version uses modern day language, yet it captures the true meaning of the root language. So I referred to the Message version when the preacher was mentioning these verses.

These verses I haven't heard before and it was sort of like an eye opener on what the Bible says on charity. I have been a 'koil madu' but haven't found this verse for this long. It was profound. Check out the verses:

"Be generous: Invest in acts of ch…

How not to spend taxpayers money

If you're wondering how best your tax money is spent, then you should look at how Telangana's Rythu Bandhu Scheme works. The state government decided that it will give Rs4,000 per acre as investment incentive to all farm owners. The biggest benefit would be farm mechanization by small landowners who otherwise may not have opted for machanisation. So far so good. 

Here is the interesting thing: the incentive per acre is given to all farmers irrespective of how much land is owned, or whether he is actually tilling the land. 

So a farmer with 200 acres of land, will pocket Rs 8 lakh of public money (money that you and me pay as tax), and in all probability, he is filthy rich and is not even tilling the land. 

Anyone with any semblance of knowledge of rural economy will say there are a vast number of tenant farmers (people who don't own the land, but they till and share a portion of the product with the landlord). Telengana government in its infinite wisdom decided not to include…

Happiness, street vendors, and negotiations......

Few days back I was watching a documentary series, "India's Frontier Trains". The three-part series was on trains connecting India with its neighbours - Bangladesh, Pakistan and Nepal. Yes, there is a train connection between India and Nepal, and that train is the only functioning train for the whole of Nepal.

In the episode on the train between India and Bangladesh, the program documented a life of a chocolate seller inside the train. He boards the train in the Bangladesh side of the route. A sole bread winner for a family of four, he earns by selling chocolates in the train.

He faces a perennial problem: because of hot weather conditions, his chocolates melt. In those hot days, his earnings are meager. A basic cooling device like this costs seventeen pounds and he couldn't afford that.

What moved me was the insensitive nature of some passengers in haggling with this struggling chocolate seller. They would force down the price by 10 pence or more (which is more tha…